AI Teacher Tool for producing, publishing and assessing Exams. Ask about Content production
How Eximiatutor's AI Assessment works
Eximiatutor’s AIcheq is one of the only truly human-guided assessment tools on the market. This means the tasks are tailored to specific courses, and their emphasis aligns with the course’s teaching and study materials.
The EU’s AI Act places the assessment of exams and performances in the “high-risk” category. This is because grading is too close to a person’s subjective rights to be left entirely to the AI applications. The goal is to ensure the correctness of the assessment.
“I couldn’t have imagined grading would be this easy and stress-free”
We know that teachers often face overwhelming workloads and stress. It’s not uncommon for grading to take an entire week of work, requiring intense focus and a careful calibration of the grading scale for each student’s response. Our AI assessment technology is designed to free teachers from this burden, giving them more time for what matters most: teaching.
AI assessment elevates the study experience to a new level, and students on MOOC courses get personalized feedback quickly
AI is particularly beneficial for large, continuously running online courses (MOOCs). It is in the best interest of both the teacher and the student to have assessments completed in a short amount of time. Furthermore, these scalable courses can provide more interactivity by offering students practice assignments from which they receive feedback quickly, increasing their satisfaction.
"And the best part is, I can still consider each student's unique answer"
While AI streamlines the assessment process, the quality and relevance of the questions, along with the precise criteria (example sentences for AI grader and model answers), must still be carefully prepared.
Furthermore, the correct theoretical content, textual questions, and mathematical problems (assignments/tasks/exams) must be aligned with the syllabus, organizational strategy, or set learning goals.
Well-designed questions and supporting theory, when approached from the correct pedagogical and strategic perspective, significantly improve objectivity and enhance the workflow, particularly during the assessment stage.
The EU's AI Act requires human oversight of study content and assessment. The AI workflow is different. The criteria are set first, which differs from the teacher's usual workflow, where checking occurs afterwards. While Large Language Model (LLM) content is good, it may not be aligned with the specific course or syllabus. Therefore, it is necessary to design and test the assignments and exams before running them.
However, a teacher always has the option to modify the AI’s proposed “assessment suggestion” as they see fit. They can also provide comments (in writing or verbally) on the assessment or the student’s answer.
The teacher receives the assessment suggestion (including points and justified categories) and either accepts it or revises it, if necessary, before final acceptance.
Once a teacher “finds” a workflow where they focus on crafting questions, they can continue to use them in the future and build a question or exam bank for themselves. This further simplifies the process of administering exams.
Process stages production, publishing, answering, AI assessment, Feedback
More info; read post articles
